Blog

What is FLUX.1 [dev]?

FluxProArt ยท

What is FLUX.1 [dev]?

FLUX.1 [dev], developed by Black Forest Labs, is a groundbreaking open-source text-to-image AI model featuring a 12 billion parameter rectified flow transformer. It excels in generating high-quality, diverse images with exceptional prompt adherence, advanced human anatomy rendering, and superior text generation capabilities. While it rivals commercial models like Midjourney in output quality, users should note its substantial hardware requirements and the need for workflow adjustments when integrating with platforms like ComfyUI.

Unique Model Features

FLUX.1 [dev] distinguishes itself from other text-to-image models in several key ways:

  1. Architecture: Unlike most text-to-image models that rely on diffusion, FLUX.1 uses an upgraded technique called "flow matching." This approach allows for more direct mapping of noise to realistic images, potentially leading to faster generation and better control[1].

  2. Open-Weight Design: FLUX.1 [dev] provides open access to its weights, allowing researchers and developers to study and build upon the model. This is in contrast to closed-source models like Midjourney or DALL-E[2].

  3. Guidance-Distilled Efficiency: The model offers similar quality and prompt adherence as more resource-intensive versions while being optimized for efficiency[2].

  4. Advanced Human Anatomy: FLUX.1 excels in creating realistic and anatomically accurate images, particularly in challenging areas like hand rendering[3].

  5. Exceptional Prompt Adherence: The model demonstrates remarkable ability to accurately interpret and execute complex text descriptions, often surpassing other models in this aspect[3][4].

  6. Text Rendering: FLUX.1 shows improved capabilities in generating legible text within images, a common challenge for many text-to-image models[4].

  7. One-Shot Capability: FLUX.1 can often create high-quality images from a single prompt without the need for iterative refinement, which is not always the case with traditional models like Stable Diffusion[3].

  8. Size and Complexity: With 12 billion parameters, FLUX.1 is one of the largest open-source text-to-image models available, potentially allowing for more nuanced and diverse outputs[5][3].

  9. Licensing: FLUX.1 [dev] is specifically designed for non-commercial use, making it accessible for research, education, and personal projects without the licensing restrictions of some commercial models[2].

  10. Aesthetic Quality: Many users report that FLUX.1 produces images with a distinct aesthetic quality, often described as reminiscent of Midjourney's output, but with the advantage of being open-source[5][3].

These differences collectively position FLUX.1 [dev] as a powerful and flexible option in the text-to-image model landscape, offering a unique combination of performance, accessibility, and potential for further development by the AI community.

Dev vs Pro Comparison

FLUX.1 [dev] and FLUX.1 [pro] are two variants of the FLUX.1 text-to-image model, each designed for different use cases and audiences. Here are the main differences between them:

  1. Licensing and Availability:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is open-sourced with a non-commercial license, allowing researchers and developers to access and study the model weights[1][2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro] is a closed-source version only available through API, likely intended for commercial applications[1].

  2. Intended Use:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is specifically designed for non-commercial use, making it ideal for research, education, and personal projects[2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro] is presumably optimized for commercial applications, though specific details are not provided in the sources.

  3. Performance and Quality:

    • Both versions offer similar quality and prompt adherence[2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro] may have additional optimizations or features not present in the [dev] version, but specific details are not available in the provided sources.

  4. Access and Implementation:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] can be downloaded and run locally, allowing for more flexibility in implementation and experimentation[2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro] is only accessible through an API, which may offer easier integration for commercial applications but less flexibility for customization[1].

  5. Community Involvement:

    • As an open-source model, FLUX.1 [dev] allows for community contributions and modifications[2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro], being closed-source, does not offer the same level of community involvement or customization.

  6. Cost:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is free for non-commercial use[2].
    • FLUX.1 [pro] likely involves costs associated with API usage, though specific pricing information is not provided in the sources.

  7. Support and Updates:

    • FLUX.1 [pro] may receive more frequent updates and dedicated support from Black Forest Labs, as it's likely a revenue-generating product.
    • FLUX.1 [dev] updates may depend more on community contributions and the company's commitment to the open-source version.

While both versions share the same underlying architecture, FLUX.1 [pro] is positioned as a more controlled, potentially more optimized version for commercial use, while FLUX.1 [dev] offers greater accessibility and flexibility for non-commercial applications and research purposes.

Dev vs Schnell Comparison

FLUX.1 [dev] and FLUX.1 [schnell] are two variants of the FLUX.1 model family, each designed for different use cases and performance requirements. Here are the main differences between them:

  1. Speed and Efficiency:

    • FLUX.1 [schnell] is a distilled version of the base model, optimized to operate up to 10 times faster than FLUX.1 [dev].[1]
    • This speed boost makes FLUX.1 [schnell] more suitable for applications requiring quick image generation or for use on less powerful hardware.

  2. Image Quality:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] generally produces higher quality images with better details and fidelity.[2]
    • FLUX.1 [schnell], while faster, may sacrifice some image quality compared to the [dev] version.[2]

  3. Licensing:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is open-sourced with a non-commercial license, limiting its use to research, education, and personal projects.[1]
    • FLUX.1 [schnell] is available under the Apache 2.0 license, allowing for both commercial and non-commercial use.[1][3]

  4. Hardware Requirements:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] has higher hardware requirements, typically needing a GPU with at least 24GB of VRAM for optimal performance.
    • FLUX.1 [schnell] can run on less powerful systems, making it more accessible for users with limited hardware resources.[2]

  5. Use Cases:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is better suited for applications where image quality is paramount and processing time is less critical.
    • FLUX.1 [schnell] is ideal for rapid prototyping, local development, and applications where speed is more important than achieving the highest possible image quality.[1][3]

  6. Model Size and Complexity:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is likely a larger, more complex model, which contributes to its higher quality outputs but also increases its resource requirements.
    • FLUX.1 [schnell], being a distilled version, is smaller and more lightweight, enabling faster processing at the cost of some detail and quality.

  7. API Availability and Pricing:

    • Both models are available through APIs, with FLUX.1 [schnell] typically being less expensive to use due to its lower resource requirements. For example, one API provider offers FLUX.1 [schnell] at $0.002 per image, compared to $0.015 per image for FLUX.1 [dev].[3]

  8. Community Support and Development:

    • FLUX.1 [dev], being open-sourced for non-commercial use, may see more community contributions and experimentation.
    • FLUX.1 [schnell], with its Apache 2.0 license, might attract more commercial development and integration into various applications.

In summary, FLUX.1 [dev] offers higher quality outputs at the cost of speed and hardware requirements, while FLUX.1 [schnell] prioritizes speed and accessibility, making it suitable for a wider range of applications and users, especially those with limited computational resources or need for rapid image generation.

Hardware Requirements

FLUX.1 [dev] has substantial hardware requirements due to its large model size and complexity. Here are the key hardware specifications needed to run FLUX.1 [dev] effectively:

  1. GPU VRAM:

    • A minimum of 24GB VRAM is recommended for optimal performance.[1]
    • High-end GPUs like NVIDIA A40 or multiple A6000s are ideal for training and running the model.[2]

  2. CPU:

    • A powerful CPU is necessary, with a minimum recommendation of a quad-core processor at 2 GHz or higher.[3]

  3. System RAM:

    • At least 16GB of system RAM is recommended.[3]
    • Some users report that FLUX requires up to 24GB of CPU RAM when loading model checkpoints.[1]

  4. Storage:

    • A minimum of 500GB disk space with 7200rpm speed is suggested for server setups.[3]
    • For the model itself, at least 70MB of available space is required.[4]

  5. Network:

    • For standalone systems, at least one network interface card is needed.[3]
    • For cluster setups, a minimum of two network interface cards is recommended.[3]

  6. Operating System:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] can run on various operating systems, including Windows and Linux distributions.[4][3]

It's important to note that these requirements can vary depending on the specific use case and implementation. For users with less powerful hardware, there are some workarounds:

  • Using FP8 quantization can reduce VRAM usage, allowing the model to run on GPUs with less memory, albeit with a potential slight reduction in output quality.[2]
  • For systems with 8GB GPUs, it's recommended to use FLUX.1 [schnell] instead, which is optimized for faster generation on less powerful hardware.[1]

When running FLUX.1 [dev], users should be prepared for significant resource utilization. For example, on an RTX 3090 (24GB VRAM), the model processes at about 1.29 seconds per iteration, while on an RTX 4070 (12GB VRAM) using the FP8 quantized version, it takes about 85 seconds per iteration.[2]

These hardware requirements highlight the computational intensity of FLUX.1 [dev] and underscore the importance of having robust hardware for optimal performance when working with this advanced text-to-image model.

FLUX vs SD3 Comparison

FLUX.1 [dev] demonstrates several key strengths compared to Stable Diffusion 3 (SD3):

  1. Image Quality and Detail: Users on Reddit have reported that FLUX.1 [dev] generally produces higher quality images with better details compared to SD3 medium[1][2]. FLUX.1 [dev] is often described as having a more stylistic, surreal look that some users prefer[1].

  2. Prompt Adherence: FLUX.1 [dev] shows superior ability in understanding and following complex prompts accurately. Users have noted that it performs better than SD3 in interpreting and executing detailed text descriptions[3].

  3. Anatomy and Hands: FLUX.1 [dev] excels in creating more accurate human anatomy, particularly hands, which has been a common issue with many AI image generators including SD3[2][4].

  4. Text Generation: FLUX.1 [dev] demonstrates improved capabilities in generating legible text within images, an area where SD3 and many other models often struggle[4].

  5. Diversity in Output: FLUX.1 [dev] appears to offer more diverse outputs, especially when it comes to generating images of people. Some users have noted that SD3 tends to default to certain ethnicities, while FLUX.1 [dev] provides a wider range[2].

  6. Complex Scenes: FLUX.1 [dev] handles complex scenes with multiple subjects better than SD3, requiring fewer adjustments or inpainting to achieve desired results[2].

  7. Stylization: While SD3 may have an edge in photorealism for certain types of images, many users prefer the stylized aesthetic of FLUX.1 [dev], describing it as reminiscent of Midjourney's output but with the advantage of being open-source[1][4].

  8. Efficiency: Despite being a larger model, FLUX.1 [dev] is reported to be more efficient in terms of image generation speed compared to SD3, especially for complex prompts[3].

However, it's important to note that FLUX.1 [dev] has higher hardware requirements compared to SD3, typically needing a GPU with at least 24GB of VRAM for optimal performance[5]. Additionally, while FLUX.1 [dev] is open-source, it's currently not as easily fine-tunable as SD3, which may be a consideration for users looking to customize the model for specific use cases[3].

In summary, while both models have their strengths, FLUX.1 [dev] appears to offer superior performance in several key areas, particularly in prompt adherence, anatomical accuracy, and handling complex scenes. However, the choice between the two may depend on specific use cases, hardware availability, and whether photorealism or stylized outputs are preferred.

FLUX vs SDXL Comparison

FLUX.1 [dev] demonstrates several key strengths when compared to SDXL-based models like PonyXL, Juggernaut XL, and Dreamshaper XL:

  1. Prompt Adherence: FLUX.1 [dev] excels in accurately interpreting and executing complex text prompts. Users report that it often outperforms SDXL models in creating images that closely match detailed descriptions[1].

  2. Diversity in Output: FLUX.1 [dev] generates a wide variety of unique individuals without the need for additional tools or prompts. It produces diverse facial features, hair colors, hairstyles, and body shapes automatically, which is not always the case with SDXL models[2].

  3. Text Rendering: FLUX.1 [dev] shows superior capabilities in generating legible text within images, a common challenge for many text-to-image models including SDXL variants[1].

  4. Anatomical Accuracy: The model demonstrates improved rendering of human anatomy, particularly hands, which has been a persistent issue with many AI image generators, including some SDXL models[1].

  5. Efficiency: Despite its large size, FLUX.1 [dev] is reported to be more efficient in terms of image generation speed for complex prompts compared to some SDXL models[1].

  6. One-Shot Generation: FLUX.1 [dev] often produces high-quality images from a single prompt without the need for iterative refinement, which is not always the case with SDXL models[1].

  7. Stylistic Range: While SDXL models like PonyXL, Juggernaut XL, and Dreamshaper XL each have their own aesthetic strengths, FLUX.1 [dev] is noted for its ability to produce a wide range of styles, from photorealistic to more stylized or surreal images[1][3].

  8. Complex Scene Handling: FLUX.1 [dev] appears to handle complex scenes with multiple subjects better than many SDXL models, requiring fewer adjustments or inpainting to achieve desired results[1].

  9. Innovative Architecture: FLUX.1 uses an upgraded technique called "flow matching" instead of traditional diffusion, potentially allowing for more direct mapping of noise to realistic images[1].

However, it's important to note that FLUX.1 [dev] has higher hardware requirements compared to most SDXL models, typically needing a GPU with at least 24GB of VRAM for optimal performance[1]. Additionally, while FLUX.1 [dev] is open-source, it's currently not as easily fine-tunable as SDXL models, which may be a consideration for users looking to customize the model for specific use cases[4].

In summary, while SDXL models like PonyXL, Juggernaut XL, and Dreamshaper XL each have their strengths and dedicated user bases, FLUX.1 [dev] offers superior performance in several key areas, particularly in prompt adherence, diversity, text rendering, and handling complex scenes. The choice between these models may depend on specific use cases, hardware availability, and whether users prioritize customizability or out-of-the-box performance.

Model Architecture Comparison

FLUX.1 [dev], FLUX.1 [schnell], and FLUX.1 [pro] share the same underlying architecture, but with key differences in their implementation and optimization:

  1. Base Architecture: All three models are built on the FLUX.1 architecture, which uses a 12 billion parameter rectified flow transformer[1]. This architecture employs an upgraded technique called "flow matching" instead of traditional diffusion, allowing for more direct mapping of noise to realistic images[2].

  2. FLUX.1 [dev]:

    • This is the base model, open-sourced with a non-commercial license[3].
    • It retains the full capabilities of the FLUX.1 architecture, offering high-quality image generation and excellent prompt adherence[1].

  3. FLUX.1 [schnell]:

    • This is a distilled version of the base model[3].
    • It operates up to 10 times faster than FLUX.1 [dev], sacrificing some image quality for speed[2].
    • While it shares the core architecture, the distillation process likely involves simplifying certain components to achieve faster processing times.

  4. FLUX.1 [pro]:

    • This is a closed-source version, only available through API[3].
    • It likely shares the same core architecture as FLUX.1 [dev] but may include additional optimizations or features not present in the open-source versions[2].

  5. Performance Differences:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] and FLUX.1 [pro] offer similar quality and prompt adherence capabilities[2].
    • FLUX.1 [schnell], while faster, may produce lower quality images compared to [dev] and [pro] versions due to its optimization for speed[1].

  6. Efficiency:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] is described as more efficient than a standard model of the same size, likely due to its guidance-distilled design[2].
    • FLUX.1 [schnell] takes this efficiency further, trading some quality for significantly faster processing[3].

  7. Hardware Requirements:

    • FLUX.1 [dev] and [pro] likely have similar, higher hardware requirements.
    • FLUX.1 [schnell] is designed to run on less powerful systems, making it more accessible for users with limited hardware resources[1].

In summary, while all three models share the same core FLUX.1 architecture, they represent different trade-offs between quality, speed, and accessibility. FLUX.1 [dev] and [pro] offer the highest quality outputs, while [schnell] prioritizes speed and broader hardware compatibility. The [pro] version may include additional proprietary optimizations not present in the open-source versions.

Key Features of FLUX.1

FLUX.1 AI stands out in the field of text-to-image synthesis with several key features that set it apart from other models:

  1. Advanced Hybrid Architecture: FLUX.1 combines multimodal and parallel diffusion transformer blocks, scaled to 12 billion parameters. This architecture allows for high-quality image generation with remarkable detail and fidelity[1].

  2. Flow Matching Technique: Unlike traditional diffusion models, FLUX.1 uses an upgraded technique called "flow matching." This approach enables more direct mapping of noise to realistic images, potentially leading to faster generation and better control[2].

  3. Superior Prompt Adherence: FLUX.1 demonstrates exceptional ability to accurately interpret and execute complex text descriptions, often surpassing other models in this aspect[1][2].

  4. High-Quality Text Rendering: The model excels at accurately reproducing text within generated images, making it ideal for designs requiring legible words or phrases[1][2].

  5. Diverse Output Generation: FLUX.1 can generate a wide variety of unique individuals without the need for additional tools or prompts. It produces diverse facial features, hair colors, hairstyles, and body shapes automatically[3][4].

  6. Advanced Human Anatomy: FLUX.1 shows improved capabilities in creating realistic and anatomically accurate images, particularly in challenging areas like hand rendering[2][4].

  7. One-Shot Capability: The model can often create high-quality images from a single prompt without the need for iterative refinement, which is not always the case with traditional models[2].

  8. Multiple Model Variants: FLUX.1 offers Pro, Dev, and Schnell versions to suit different needs from commercial applications to fast local development[1][5].

  9. Open-Source Availability: FLUX.1 [dev] provides open-weight models for non-commercial use, fostering innovation and accessibility in the AI community[1][5].

  10. Efficiency: Despite its large size, FLUX.1 is reported to be more efficient in terms of image generation speed for complex prompts compared to some other models[2][4].

  11. Stylistic Range: FLUX.1 can produce a wide range of styles, from photorealistic to more stylized or surreal images, offering versatility for various creative applications[4].

  12. Complex Scene Handling: The model demonstrates superior ability in handling complex scenes with multiple subjects, often requiring fewer adjustments or inpainting to achieve desired results[2][4].

These features collectively position FLUX.1 as a powerful and versatile tool in the text-to-image synthesis landscape, offering a unique combination of performance, accessibility, and potential for further development by the AI community.

Community Reception and Feedback

The reception of FLUX.1 [dev] from the AI art community has been largely positive, with users praising various aspects of the model:

  1. Image Quality: Many users have reported that FLUX.1 [dev] produces high-quality images with exceptional detail and fidelity. On Reddit, users have compared its output favorably to commercial services like Midjourney, noting its ability to generate visually striking and diverse images[1].

  2. Prompt Adherence: One of the most praised features is FLUX.1 [dev]'s ability to accurately interpret and execute complex prompts. Users have found that it often outperforms other models in creating images that closely match detailed descriptions[1].

  3. Diversity in Output: The community has been particularly impressed with FLUX.1 [dev]'s ability to generate a wide variety of unique individuals without the need for additional tools or prompts. Users appreciate the automatic diversity in facial features, hair colors, hairstyles, and body shapes[1].

  4. Anatomical Accuracy: Many users have noted FLUX.1 [dev]'s improved capabilities in rendering human anatomy, especially hands, which has been a common issue with many AI image generators[1].

  5. Text Rendering: The model's superior ability to generate legible text within images has been well-received, as this is often a challenge for other text-to-image models[1].

  6. Open-Source Nature: The AI community has responded positively to FLUX.1 [dev]'s open-source availability for non-commercial use, as it allows for greater accessibility and potential for further development[2].

  7. Performance on Lower-End Hardware: While FLUX.1 [dev] has high hardware requirements, users have appreciated the availability of optimized versions like FLUX.1 [schnell], which allows for faster generation on less powerful systems[3].

  8. Stylistic Range: Users have noted FLUX.1 [dev]'s ability to produce a wide range of styles, from photorealistic to more stylized or surreal images, offering versatility for various creative applications[1].

However, there are some challenges noted by the community:

  1. Hardware Requirements: Some users have found the high VRAM requirements (24GB recommended) to be a barrier to entry[4].

  2. Learning Curve: As FLUX.1 [dev] is primarily designed to work with ComfyUI, some users accustomed to other interfaces like AUTOMATIC1111 have reported a learning curve in adapting to the new workflow[4].

  3. Limited Fine-Tuning: Compared to some other models, FLUX.1 [dev] is currently not as easily fine-tunable, which may be a consideration for users looking to customize the model for specific use cases[2].

Despite these challenges, the overall reception from the community has been enthusiastic, with many users expressing excitement about the model's capabilities and potential for future development. The combination of high-quality outputs, diverse generation capabilities, and open-source availability has positioned FLUX.1 [dev] as a significant player in the AI art generation landscape.

ComfyUI Integration Guide

To use FLUX.1 [dev] in ComfyUI, follow these steps:

  1. Model Placement: Place the FLUX.1 [dev] checkpoint (flux1-dev.sft) in the ComfyUI/models/unet folder.[1]

  2. Download Required Files:

    • Text encoders: Place the flux_text_encoders files in ComfyUI/models/clip
    • VAE: Place ae.sft in ComfyUI/models/vae[1]

  3. For systems with less than 24GB VRAM, use the FP8 version (flux1-dev-fp8.safetensors) instead of the original weights.[1]

  4. Launch ComfyUI with the "--lowvram" argument to offload the text encoder to CPU for lower VRAM usage.[1]

  5. Set up the ComfyUI workflow:

    • Add a "Load Checkpoint" node and select the FLUX model
    • Connect it to a "KSampler" node
    • Add a "VAE Decode" node and connect it to the KSampler
    • Add a "Save Image" node connected to the VAE Decode[2]

  6. Important: Set the CFG scale to 1.0 in the KSampler node when using FLUX.[2]

  7. For FLUX Dev, set the weight_dtype to fp8 in the "Load Checkpoint" node for lower memory usage (may slightly reduce quality).[2]

  8. Enter your prompt in the text input field (usually connected to the KSampler node) and generate images.[2]

Performance notes:

  • RTX 3090 (24GB): 1.29s/it
  • RTX 4070 (12GB): 85s/it (using FP8 quantized version)[1]

For optimal results:

  • Experiment with detailed prompts, as FLUX excels at following complex instructions
  • Start with 20-30 sampling steps for FLUX Dev
  • Adjust resolution based on your VRAM capacity (start with 512x512 if low on VRAM)
  • Use negative prompts to refine results[2]

If you encounter "Out of Memory" errors, try reducing the resolution or using the FP8 version. For 8GB cards, consider using FLUX.1 [schnell] instead, which is optimized for faster generation on less powerful hardware.[2]

Automatic1111 Integration Unavailable

Unfortunately, FLUX.1 [dev] is not currently supported in AUTOMATIC1111's Stable Diffusion web UI. According to user reports on Reddit, there is no direct integration available for FLUX.1 [dev] with AUTOMATIC1111.[1]

The primary reason for this lack of support is that FLUX.1 [dev] uses a different architecture compared to traditional Stable Diffusion models. FLUX.1 employs a rectified flow transformer and a technique called "flow matching" instead of the diffusion process used in Stable Diffusion models.[2] This fundamental difference in architecture makes it incompatible with the AUTOMATIC1111 interface, which is designed specifically for Stable Diffusion models.

For users who want to use FLUX.1 [dev], the recommended approach is to use ComfyUI instead. ComfyUI is designed to be more flexible and can accommodate various model architectures, including FLUX.1 [dev].[3] The workflow for using FLUX.1 [dev] in ComfyUI involves placing the model checkpoint in the appropriate folder, downloading required files such as text encoders and VAE, and setting up a specific workflow within the ComfyUI interface.

It's worth noting that while AUTOMATIC1111 doesn't support FLUX.1 [dev], it does support a wide range of Stable Diffusion models, including various SDXL models like PonyXL, Juggernaut XL, and Dreamshaper XL. Users who prefer the AUTOMATIC1111 interface may need to stick with these compatible models or consider switching to ComfyUI for FLUX.1 [dev] usage.

For those who are interested in using FLUX.1 [dev] but are accustomed to AUTOMATIC1111, it's important to be aware that there may be a learning curve in adapting to the ComfyUI workflow. However, many users report that the superior capabilities of FLUX.1 [dev] in areas such as prompt adherence, image quality, and handling of complex scenes make the transition worthwhile.

Read More
What is FLUX.1 [schnell]?
Training Your Own Flux LoRA Model